![]() ![]() If necessary, I can come up with a sample file that shows my situation, but I'd like to understand the best practices over spoon feeding. This seems tedious, so maybe there is a better way. I ask this because if I want to get a 2D DXF output of each part, I have to create a named view perpendicular to a face and then use that for the drawing. ![]() Aid in the monitoring the preventive maintenance. ![]() Maximize production output with a high emphasis on quality. What is the right way to take a component placed in an arbitrary position and make it ready for CAM? Operate production machinery, run CNC and other machinery to hit production targets. In particular, my 3D models may be made of components that are positioned in space (in particular, not placed on any of their "XY, XZ, YZ" planes) but when seen from a certain angle, flat with a thickness equivalent to the stock material. Assuming that part is taken care of, meaning the cutting process and the machine are tuned in and provide satisfactory results with test cuts, I would like to learn the "state of the art" CAM workflow in Fusion360 for this application. Just today I found out that Fusion has a bunch of 'hidden' tolerance settings that can be accessed by right-clicking on a toolpath and then choosing 'compare and edit' and filtering the parameters by 'tolerance', which gives you this:Hello, so far I feel confident in the 3D modeling in Fusion 360. Catalog Fusion 360 for makers : design your own digital models for 3D printing and CNC fabrication Cline, Lydia Sloan Call Number: 621.988 C641-3 View: OverDrive Catalog Mastering SolidWorks Lombard, Matt Call Number: 620. Apparently this is fairly common with CAM software, I just didn't realize that was how it worked.Īfter that revelation I started paying a lot more attention to the 'tolerance' setting in the Fusion toolpath dialog as it directly impacts how finely the mesh is generated, and found that setting it to very small values (0.00001mm) drastically improved the quality of my surface finishes, at the expense of much longer times for computing the toolpaths. However I recently found out Fusion 360 does not create toolpaths directly from the solid model, instead it creates a mesh of the model first and then makes the toolpaths from that. ![]() For the longest time I thought that my 'old' Fadals simply weren't capable of creating really high quality surface finishes, I would always get small inconsistencies in between passes when doing a finishing toolpath, and that would leave divots and so on that I'd have to hand finish out. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |